0.00/0.05 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.00/0.09 % Command : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM 0.20/0.46 % Computer : n031.cluster.edu 0.20/0.46 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.20/0.46 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.20/0.46 % Memory : 8046.5625MB 0.20/0.46 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic 0.20/0.46 % CPULimit : 1440 0.20/0.46 % WCLimit : 180 0.20/0.46 % DateTime : Mon Jul 27 09:47:26 UTC 2026 0.20/0.47 % CPUTime : 0.20/0.47 Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM 0.25/0.53 Running higher-order theorem proving 0.25/0.55 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.31/0.61 % (4064654)Detected a higher-order problem, will run a greedy HOL sequence. 0.31/0.61 % (4064662)dis+1002_4:1_sfv=off:to=lpo:plsq=on:fde=none:e2e=on:si=on:spb=non_intro:acc=on:uwa=off:fd=preordered:foolp=on:s2agt=32:slsqc=1:slsq=on:random_seed=2876198391:hsq=on:hsqr=16,1:s2a=on:i=634:add=on:nm=16:nicw=on:rtra=on:gtg=position:ss=included:ixr=off:c=on:inj=on:ntd=on:rawr=on_1799 on theBenchmark for (1799ds/634Mi) 0.31/0.61 % (4064662) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-4064654-4064662"... 0.31/0.61 % (4064665)WARNING Broken Constraint: if ho_split_queue_ratios(1,8) has been set then ho_split_queue(off) is equal to on 0.31/0.61 % (4064665)WARNING Broken Constraint: if sine_to_age_tolerance(5) has been set then sine_to_age(off) is equal to on or sine_to_pred_levels(off) is not equal to off or sine_level_split_queue(off) is equal to on 0.31/0.61 % (4064662)...printing done. 0.31/0.61 % (4064662)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya! 0.31/0.61 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark 0.31/0.61 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark 0.31/0.61 thf(type_def_5, type, num: $tType). 0.31/0.61 thf(type_def_6, type, sTfun: ($tType * $tType) > $tType). 0.31/0.61 thf(func_def_0, type, believes_THFTYPE_IiooI: ($i > $o > $o)). 0.31/0.61 thf(func_def_1, type, considers_THFTYPE_IiooI: ($i > $o > $o)). 0.31/0.61 thf(func_def_2, type, holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: ($i > $o > $o)). 0.31/0.61 thf(func_def_3, type, husband_THFTYPE_IiioI: ($i > $i > $o)). 0.31/0.61 thf(func_def_5, type, wife_THFTYPE_IiioI: ($i > $i > $o)). 0.31/0.61 thf(func_def_6, type, inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI: (($i > $i > $o) > ($i > $i > $o) > $o)). 0.31/0.61 thf(func_def_7, type, vNOT: ($o > $o)). 0.31/0.61 thf(func_def_11, type, vSIGMA: !>[X0: $tType]:(((X0 > $o) > $o))). 0.31/0.61 thf(func_def_12, type, db0: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)). 0.31/0.61 thf(func_def_13, type, vLAM: !>[X0: $tType, X1: $tType]:((X1) > (X0 > X1))). 0.31/0.61 thf(func_def_14, type, sK0: ($i > $o > $i)). 0.31/0.61 thf(f1,axiom,( 0.31/0.61 ! [X0 : $i] : (~ ? [X1 : $i] : (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X1 @ (considers_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lMax_THFTYPE_i @ (wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X0 @ lMax_THFTYPE_i))))), 0.31/0.61 file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_003)). 0.31/0.61 thf(f2,axiom,( 0.31/0.61 ! [X0 : $o,X1 : $i] : ((believes_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X1 @ X0) => ? [X2 : $i] : (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X2 @ (considers_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X1 @ X0)))), 0.31/0.61 file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_002)). 0.31/0.61 thf(f3,axiom,( 0.31/0.61 ! [X0 : ($i > $i > $o),X1 : ($i > $i > $o)] : ((inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ X1 @ X0) => ! [X2 : $i,X3 : $i] : ((X1 @ X2 @ X3) <=> (X0 @ X3 @ X2)))), 0.31/0.61 file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_001)). 0.31/0.61 thf(f4,axiom,( 0.31/0.61 (inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ wife_THFTYPE_IiioI)), 0.31/0.61 file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax)). 0.31/0.61 thf(f5,conjecture,( 0.31/0.61 ? [X0 : $i] : (~ (believes_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lMax_THFTYPE_i @ (husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMax_THFTYPE_i @ X0)))), 0.31/0.61 file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con)). 0.31/0.61 thf(f6,negated_conjecture,( 0.31/0.61 ~ ? [X0 : $i] : (~ (believes_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lMax_THFTYPE_i @ (husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMax_THFTYPE_i @ X0)))), 0.31/0.61 inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f5])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f7,plain,( 0.31/0.61 ~ ? [X0 : $i] : (~ (believes_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lMax_THFTYPE_i @ (husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMax_THFTYPE_i @ X0)))), 0.31/0.61 inference(rectify,[],[f6])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f8,plain,( 0.31/0.61 ~ ? [X0 : $i] : (((~ (believes_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lMax_THFTYPE_i @ (husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMax_THFTYPE_i @ X0)))) = $true)), 0.31/0.61 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f7])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f9,plain,( 0.31/0.61 (inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ wife_THFTYPE_IiioI)), 0.31/0.61 inference(rectify,[],[f4])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f10,plain,( 0.31/0.61 (((inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ wife_THFTYPE_IiioI)) = $true)), 0.31/0.61 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f9])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f11,plain,( 0.31/0.61 ! [X0 : ($i > $i > $o),X1 : ($i > $i > $o)] : ((inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ X1 @ X0) => ! [X2 : $i,X3 : $i] : ((X1 @ X2 @ X3) <=> (X0 @ X3 @ X2)))), 0.31/0.61 inference(rectify,[],[f3])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f12,plain,( 0.31/0.61 ! [X1 : ($i > $i > $o),X0 : ($i > $i > $o)] : ((((inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ X1 @ X0)) = $true) => ! [X3 : $i,X2 : $i] : (((X1 @ X2 @ X3)) = ((X0 @ X3 @ X2))))), 0.31/0.61 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f11])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f13,plain,( 0.31/0.61 ! [X0 : $o,X1 : $i] : ((believes_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X1 @ X0) => ? [X2 : $i] : (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X2 @ (considers_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X1 @ X0)))), 0.31/0.61 inference(rectify,[],[f2])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f14,plain,( 0.31/0.61 ! [X0 : $o,X1 : $i] : ((((believes_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X1 @ X0)) = $true) => ? [X2 : $i] : (((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X2 @ (considers_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X1 @ X0))) = $true))), 0.31/0.61 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f13])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f15,plain,( 0.31/0.61 ! [X0 : $i] : (~ ? [X1 : $i] : (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X1 @ (considers_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lMax_THFTYPE_i @ (wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X0 @ lMax_THFTYPE_i))))), 0.31/0.61 inference(rectify,[],[f1])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f16,plain,( 0.31/0.61 ! [X0 : $i] : (((~ (?? @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ Y0 @ (considers_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lMax_THFTYPE_i @ (wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X0 @ lMax_THFTYPE_i))))))) = $true)), 0.31/0.61 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f15])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f17,plain,( 0.31/0.61 ! [X0 : $i] : (((~ (believes_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lMax_THFTYPE_i @ (husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMax_THFTYPE_i @ X0)))) != $true)), 0.31/0.61 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f8])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f18,plain,( 0.31/0.61 ! [X0 : $o,X1 : $i] : (? [X2 : $i] : (((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X2 @ (considers_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X1 @ X0))) = $true) | (((believes_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X1 @ X0)) != $true))), 0.31/0.61 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f14])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f19,plain,( 0.31/0.61 ! [X1 : ($i > $i > $o),X0 : ($i > $i > $o)] : (! [X3 : $i,X2 : $i] : (((X1 @ X2 @ X3)) = ((X0 @ X3 @ X2))) | (((inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ X1 @ X0)) != $true))), 0.31/0.61 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f12])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f20,plain,( 0.31/0.61 ! [X0 : ($i > $i > $o),X1 : ($i > $i > $o)] : (! [X2 : $i,X3 : $i] : (((X1 @ X2 @ X3)) = ((X0 @ X3 @ X2))) | ($true != ((inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ X0 @ X1))))), 0.31/0.61 inference(rectify,[],[f19])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f21,plain,( 0.31/0.61 ! [X0 : $o,X1 : $i] : ((((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (sK0 @ X1 @ X0) @ (considers_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X1 @ X0))) = $true) | (((believes_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X1 @ X0)) != $true))), 0.31/0.61 inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[vAPP]),skolemize(X2,sK0 @ X1 @ X0)],[f18])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f22,plain,( 0.31/0.61 ( ! [X0 : $i] : ((((~ (?? @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ Y0 @ (considers_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lMax_THFTYPE_i @ (wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X0 @ lMax_THFTYPE_i))))))) = $true)) )), 0.31/0.61 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f23,plain,( 0.31/0.61 ( ! [X2 : $i,X3 : $i,X0 : ($i > $i > $o),X1 : ($i > $i > $o)] : (($true != ((inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ X0 @ X1))) | (((X1 @ X2 @ X3)) = ((X0 @ X3 @ X2)))) )), 0.31/0.61 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f20])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f24,plain,( 0.31/0.61 ( ! [X0 : $o,X1 : $i] : ((((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (sK0 @ X1 @ X0) @ (considers_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X1 @ X0))) = $true) | (((believes_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X1 @ X0)) != $true)) )), 0.31/0.61 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f25,plain,( 0.31/0.61 (((inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ wife_THFTYPE_IiioI)) = $true)), 0.31/0.61 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f26,plain,( 0.31/0.61 ( ! [X0 : $i] : ((((~ (believes_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lMax_THFTYPE_i @ (husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMax_THFTYPE_i @ X0)))) != $true)) )), 0.31/0.61 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f28,plain,( 0.31/0.61 ( ! [X0 : $i] : ((((believes_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lMax_THFTYPE_i @ (husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMax_THFTYPE_i @ X0))) = $true)) )), 0.31/0.61 inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f26])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f29,plain,( 0.31/0.61 ( ! [X0 : $i] : ((((?? @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ Y0 @ (considers_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lMax_THFTYPE_i @ (wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X0 @ lMax_THFTYPE_i)))))) = $false)) )), 0.31/0.61 inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f22])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f30,plain,( 0.31/0.61 ( ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (($false = (((^[Y0 : $i]: (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ Y0 @ (considers_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lMax_THFTYPE_i @ (wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X0 @ lMax_THFTYPE_i)))) @ X1)))) )), 0.31/0.61 inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f29])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f31,plain,( 0.31/0.61 ( ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : ((((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X1 @ (considers_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lMax_THFTYPE_i @ (wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X0 @ lMax_THFTYPE_i)))) = $false)) )), 0.31/0.61 inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f30])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f32,plain,( 0.31/0.61 ( ! [X2 : $i,X3 : $i,X0 : ($i > $i > $o),X1 : ($i > $i > $o)] : (($true != ((inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ X0 @ X1))) | (((X1 @ X2 @ X3)) = $true) | (((X0 @ X3 @ X2)) = $false)) )), 0.31/0.61 inference(iff_proxy_clausification,[],[f23])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f33,plain,( 0.31/0.61 ( ! [X2 : $i,X3 : $i,X0 : ($i > $i > $o),X1 : ($i > $i > $o)] : (($true != ((inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ X0 @ X1))) | (((X1 @ X2 @ X3)) = $false) | (((X0 @ X3 @ X2)) = $true)) )), 0.31/0.61 inference(iff_proxy_clausification,[],[f23])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f35,definition,( 0.31/0.61 spl1_1 <=> (((inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ wife_THFTYPE_IiioI)) = $true)), 0.31/0.61 introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl1_1])],[avatar_definition])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f37,plain,( 0.31/0.61 (((inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ wife_THFTYPE_IiioI)) = $true) | ~spl1_1), 0.31/0.61 inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f35])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f38,plain,( 0.31/0.61 spl1_1), 0.31/0.61 inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f25,f35])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f39,plain,( 0.31/0.61 ( ! [X0 : $i] : ((((believes_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lMax_THFTYPE_i @ $true)) = $true) | (((husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMax_THFTYPE_i @ X0)) = $false)) )), 0.31/0.61 inference(fool_paramodulation,[],[f28])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f41,definition,( 0.31/0.61 spl1_2 <=> (((believes_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lMax_THFTYPE_i @ $true)) = $true)), 0.31/0.61 introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl1_2])],[avatar_definition])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f45,definition,( 0.31/0.61 spl1_3 <=> ! [X0 : $i] : (((husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMax_THFTYPE_i @ X0)) = $false)), 0.31/0.61 introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl1_3])],[avatar_definition])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f46,plain,( 0.31/0.61 ( ! [X0 : $i] : ((((husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMax_THFTYPE_i @ X0)) = $false)) ) | ~spl1_3), 0.31/0.61 inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f45])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f47,plain,( 0.31/0.61 spl1_2 | spl1_3), 0.31/0.61 inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f39,f45,f41])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f48,plain,( 0.31/0.61 (((believes_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lMax_THFTYPE_i @ $false)) = $true) | ~spl1_3), 0.31/0.61 inference(superposition,[],[f28,f46])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f50,definition,( 0.31/0.61 spl1_4 <=> (((believes_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lMax_THFTYPE_i @ $false)) = $true)), 0.31/0.61 introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl1_4])],[avatar_definition])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f52,plain,( 0.31/0.61 (((believes_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lMax_THFTYPE_i @ $false)) = $true) | ~spl1_4), 0.31/0.61 inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f50])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f53,plain,( 0.31/0.61 spl1_4 | ~spl1_3), 0.31/0.61 inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f48,f45,f50])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f67,definition,( 0.31/0.61 spl1_8 <=> ! [X0 : $i] : (((wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X0 @ lMax_THFTYPE_i)) = $false)), 0.31/0.61 introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl1_8])],[avatar_definition])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f68,plain,( 0.31/0.61 ( ! [X0 : $i] : ((((wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X0 @ lMax_THFTYPE_i)) = $false)) ) | ~spl1_8), 0.31/0.61 inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f67])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f71,plain,( 0.31/0.61 ( ! [X0 : $i] : (($true != ((believes_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lMax_THFTYPE_i @ (wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X0 @ lMax_THFTYPE_i)))) | ($false = $true)) )), 0.31/0.61 inference(superposition,[],[f24,f31])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f73,plain,( 0.31/0.61 ( ! [X0 : $i] : (($true != ((believes_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lMax_THFTYPE_i @ (wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X0 @ lMax_THFTYPE_i))))) )), 0.31/0.61 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f71])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f75,plain,( 0.31/0.61 ( ! [X0 : $i] : ((((wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X0 @ lMax_THFTYPE_i)) = $false) | (((believes_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lMax_THFTYPE_i @ $true)) != $true)) )), 0.31/0.61 inference(fool_paramodulation,[],[f73])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f76,plain,( 0.31/0.61 ~spl1_2 | spl1_8), 0.31/0.61 inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f75,f67,f41])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f86,plain,( 0.31/0.61 (((believes_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lMax_THFTYPE_i @ $false)) != $true) | ~spl1_8), 0.31/0.61 inference(superposition,[],[f73,f68])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f88,plain,( 0.31/0.61 $false | (~spl1_4 | ~spl1_8)), 0.31/0.61 inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f86,f52])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f89,plain,( 0.31/0.61 ~spl1_4 | ~spl1_8), 0.31/0.61 inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f88])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f104,plain,( 0.31/0.61 ( ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (($false = ((husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X1 @ X0))) | ($true != $true) | ($true = ((wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X0 @ X1)))) ) | ~spl1_1), 0.31/0.61 inference(superposition,[],[f32,f37])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f105,plain,( 0.31/0.61 ( ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (($true = ((wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X0 @ X1))) | ($false = ((husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X1 @ X0)))) ) | ~spl1_1), 0.31/0.61 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f104])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f107,plain,( 0.31/0.61 ( ! [X0 : $i] : ((((believes_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lMax_THFTYPE_i @ $true)) != $true) | (((husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMax_THFTYPE_i @ X0)) = $false)) ) | ~spl1_1), 0.31/0.61 inference(superposition,[],[f73,f105])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f109,plain,( 0.31/0.61 ( ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (($true != $true) | ($true = ((husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X1 @ X0))) | ($false = ((wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X0 @ X1)))) ) | ~spl1_1), 0.31/0.61 inference(superposition,[],[f33,f37])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f110,plain,( 0.31/0.61 ( ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (($true = ((husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X1 @ X0))) | ($false = ((wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X0 @ X1)))) ) | ~spl1_1), 0.31/0.61 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f109])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f113,plain,( 0.31/0.61 ( ! [X0 : $i] : ((((believes_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lMax_THFTYPE_i @ $true)) = $true) | (((wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X0 @ lMax_THFTYPE_i)) = $false)) ) | ~spl1_1), 0.31/0.61 inference(superposition,[],[f28,f110])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f119,plain,( 0.31/0.61 ~spl1_2 | spl1_3 | ~spl1_1), 0.31/0.61 inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f107,f35,f45,f41])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f120,plain,( 0.31/0.61 spl1_2 | spl1_8 | ~spl1_1), 0.31/0.61 inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f113,f35,f67,f41])). 0.31/0.61 cnf(s1, plain, spl1_1, inference(sat_conversion,[],[f38])). 0.31/0.61 cnf(s2, plain, spl1_2 | spl1_3, inference(sat_conversion,[],[f47])). 0.31/0.61 cnf(s3, plain, ~spl1_3 | spl1_4, inference(sat_conversion,[],[f53])). 0.31/0.61 cnf(s6, plain, ~spl1_2 | spl1_8, inference(sat_conversion,[],[f76])). 0.31/0.61 cnf(s8, plain, ~spl1_4 | ~spl1_8, inference(sat_conversion,[],[f89])). 0.31/0.61 cnf(s16, plain, ~spl1_1 | ~spl1_2 | spl1_3, inference(sat_conversion,[],[f119])). 0.31/0.61 cnf(s17, plain, ~spl1_1 | spl1_2 | spl1_8, inference(sat_conversion,[],[f120])). 0.31/0.61 cnf(s19, plain, spl1_2, inference(rat,[],[s3,s8,s2,s17,s1])). 0.31/0.61 cnf(s20, plain, spl1_3, inference(rat,[],[s16,s1,s19])). 0.31/0.61 cnf(s22, plain, spl1_8, inference(rat,[],[s6,s19])). 0.31/0.61 cnf(s23, plain, spl1_4, inference(rat,[],[s3,s20])). 0.31/0.61 cnf(s24, plain, $false, inference(rat,[],[s8,s22,s23])). 0.31/0.61 thf(f125,plain,( 0.31/0.61 $false), 0.31/0.61 inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[s24])). 0.31/0.61 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark 0.31/0.61 % (4064662)------------------------------ 0.31/0.61 % (4064662)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200) 0.31/0.61 % (4064662)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c 0.31/0.61 % (4064662)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3 0.31/0.61 % (4064662)Termination reason: Refutation 0.31/0.61 % (4064662)Time elapsed: 0.007 s 0.31/0.61 % (4064662)Peak memory usage: 13 MB 0.31/0.61 % (4064662)Instructions burned: 9 (million) 0.31/0.61 % (4064654)Success in time 0.045 s 0.31/0.61 % Vampire exiting 0.31/0.62 EOF